
ASUS RT-G32 rev. C1 and RT-N10 rev.B1
Written by Administrator
Wednesday, 12 December 2012 12:12 -
We don’t consider the detected insecurities critical except for the probability of running aDoS-attack on the built-in DNS-server.
We certainly tested the devices’ performance. For testing, we used the JPerf 2.0.2 utility. Themain parameters of the testing stand are below.
Component
PC
Notebook
Motherboard
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z
ASUS M60J
CPU
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4 GHz
Intel Core i7 720QM 1.6 GHz
RAM
DDR3 PC3-10700 SEC 32 Gbytes
DDR3 PC3-10700 SEC 16 Gbytes
NIC
Intel 82579VIntel 82583VD-Link DWA-160
Atheros AR8131Atheros AR9285
Operating system
Windows 7 x64 SP1 Rus
Windows 7 x64 SP1 Rus
First, we measured the data transmission speed between the wired and wireless networksegments for one, five and fifteen simultaneous TCP-connections.
Then we measured transmission rates between the LAN and WAN segments with NAT beingused.
Also we measured user data transmission speed via PPTP with and without the use of MPPE.The obtained results are below.
Here we’d like to finish the testing section and make conclusions.
Conclusion
So far in our testing lab we have only tested upmarket or middle-market models of ASUS
wireless routers. The current material fills the gap and presents to our readers a review of
low-cost wireless routaers with Fast Ethernet ports - ASUS RT-N10 rev. B1 and ASUS RT-G32
rev. C1. They are the cheapest devices of this vendor we’ve ever seen. Naturally, we didn’t
expect performance nywhere near that of upmarket products; however, the speeds we got were
a nasty surprise. We think that ASUS RT-N10 rev. B1 and ASUS RT-G32 rev. C1 will suit only
the most undemanding users or those whose budget is very limited. In all other cases we’d
advise to turn to at least RT-N10U which we described in one of our reviews .
The advantages of the tested devices are listed below.
17 / 18
Comentários a estes Manuais